Inverse Condemnation
A legal action where a property owner sues the government claiming their land has been taken or damaged by government action without just compensation. Unlike traditional eminent domain, the property owner initiates the lawsuit rather than the government.
Example
“The homeowner filed an inverse condemnation lawsuit against the city, claiming the new airport flight path made her property uninhabitable and constituted a taking without compensation.”
Memory Tip
It's condemnation turned upside down (inverse) - instead of the government condemning your property, you're condemning the government's actions.
Why It Matters
This legal remedy protects property owners when government actions significantly damage their property value or use without formal condemnation proceedings. It ensures constitutional compensation rights are preserved even in indirect takings.
Common Misconception
Many property owners think they must accept government actions that harm their property value without recourse if no formal condemnation occurs.
In Practice
A homeowner files an inverse condemnation lawsuit after a city drainage project floods their basement repeatedly, arguing the government effectively took their property's beneficial use without compensation.
Etymology
From 'inverse' (Latin 'inversus' = turned upside down) plus 'condemnation,' describing the reverse of normal condemnation where the property owner sues the government instead of vice versa.
Common Misspellings
Compare today's mortgage rates
More in real estate
Other real estate terms you should know
Need financial definitions?
Clear definitions for 2,500+ finance, insurance, and investing terms.